Keppler, Abbey L

Add to Favorites

Attorneys, Bankruptcy Law Attorneys, Bankruptcy Services

Be the first to review!

OPEN NOW

Today: 9:00 am - 5:00 pm

23 Years

in Business

(212) 806-5845Call Visit WebsiteVisit Website Map & DirectionsDirections180 Maiden Ln Fl 4New York, NY 10038 Write a ReviewWrite Review

Is this your business?

Customize this page.

Claim This Business

Hours

Regular Hours

Mon - Fri:	9:00 am - 5:00 pm

Keppler, Abbey L

Sex Crimes
The firm also provides reasonable accommodations in accordance with applicable law, including to qualified individuals (i) with known disabilities, (ii) who are pregnant, (iii) who suffer from a medical condition due to pregnancy or child birth, (iv) for sincerely held religious beliefs, or (v) who are victims of domestic violence, sex offenses or stalking, upon request or when made aware of such a need, unless doing so would result in an undue hardship to the firm. If you require an accommodation in connection with the performance of your job, you should contact the Human Resources Department, who will engage in a cooperative dialogue with you and provide you with a written determination as to whether your request for an accommodation is approved or denied. Please understand that the firm may offer a different accommodation than the one requested.

View All Services

Provided by

Places Near New York with Attorneys

Hoboken (5 miles)
Long Island City (6 miles)
Jersey City (7 miles)
Brooklyn (8 miles)
Union City (8 miles)
Astoria (10 miles)
Elmhurst (11 miles)
Jackson Heights (12 miles)
Forest Hills (13 miles)
Newark (14 miles)

More Info

Location: 180 Maiden Lane Bldg
Neighborhoods: Downtown Manhattan, Financial District
AKA: Keppler, Abbey L - Stroock &Stroock & Lavan Llp
Other Link: http://www.stroock.com
Categories: Attorneys, Bankruptcy Law Attorneys, Bankruptcy Services, Business Law Attorneys, Business Litigation Attorneys, Criminal Law Attorneys, Estate Planning, Probate, & Living Trusts, General Practice Attorneys, Labor & Employment Law Attorneys, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Attorneys, Real Estate Attorneys, Trust Companies, Wills, Trusts & Estate Planning Attorneys

GalleryView all (1)

Gallery Image Number 1

Reviews

Hi there!
Be the first to review!

Click to Rate

Details

Phone: (212) 806-5845

Address: 180 Maiden Ln Fl 4, New York, NY 10038

Website: http://www.stroock.com

People Also Viewed

View similar Attorneys

Suggest an Edit

Keppler, Abbey L

Sex Crimes
The firm also provides reasonable accommodations in accordance with applicable law, including to qualified individuals (i) with known disabilities, (ii) who are pregnant, (iii) who suffer from a medical condition due to pregnancy or child birth, (iv) for sincerely held religious beliefs, or (v) who are victims of domestic violence, sex offenses or stalking, upon request or when made aware of such a need, unless doing so would result in an undue hardship to the firm. If you require an accommodation in connection with the performance of your job, you should contact the Human Resources Department, who will engage in a cooperative dialogue with you and provide you with a written determination as to whether your request for an accommodation is approved or denied. Please understand that the firm may offer a different accommodation than the one requested.
Misdemeanors
John Kiely, now Special Counsel at Stroock, while of Counsel at Blank Rome, submitted an application on behalf of his pro bono client, an individual whose 1980s misdemeanor and a felony conviction was adversely impacting his life and well-being.
Murder
Beginning in 2021, a team of Stroock attorneys partnered with LatinoJustice PRLDF to author an amicus brief in support of a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court seeking review of an Arizona court’s refusal, duration the sentencing of a defendant convicted of murder, to give the jury instructions in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1994 decision in Simmons v. South Carolina. In Simmons, the Court held that where a capital defendant’s future dangerousness is at issue, and the only alternative sentence available is life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, the sentencing jury must be informed that the defendant is ineligible for parole.

Business and Corporate Law

Trade Secrets
Intellectual Property
Unfair Competition
California remains at the forefront of consumer litigation, enforcement and regulation. We are pleased to provide our 2023 Annual Overview of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”).
Antitrust

Employment Contract
To recap, on January 5, the FTC proposed a near-complete ban on non-compete clauses in employment contracts, including a retroactive elimination of existing agreements.
Employment Litigation
Answer: No. General Counsel Abruzzo takes issue with general releases and covenants not to sue that go beyond the employer and employment claims, as well as matters after the effective date of the agreement.
Non-compete Agreement
The proposed Non-Compete Clause Rule represents a radical departure from hundreds of years of legal precedent that employs a fact-specific inquiry into whether a non-compete clause is unreasonable in duration and scope, given the business justification for the restriction. The Commission undertakes this radical departure despite what appears at this time to be a lack of clear evidence to support the proposed rule. What little enforcement experience the agency has with employee non-compete provisions is very recent (within the last week) and fails to demonstrate harm to consumers and competition. Lacking enforcement experience, the Commission turns to academic literature – but the current record shows that studies in this area are scant, contain mixed results, and provide insufficient support for the scope of the proposed rule.
Severance Agreement
On March 22, 2023, Jennifer Abruzzo, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board), issued guidance addressing the NLRB’s decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 N.L.R.B. No. 58 (Feb. 21. 2023), which held that simply proffering severance agreements with overbroad non-disparagement and confidentiality language, in and of itself, is an independent violation of Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or the Act). Please see our prior Stroock Client Alert for further details.

Real Estate Litigation
Real Estate Transactions
The benefits are significant. Excepted investors are exempt from CFIUS’s recently expanded jurisdiction, including (1) all mandatory declarations, (2) non-controlling investment jurisdiction, and (3) jurisdiction over real estate transactions not otherwise subject to review. Plainly, this status can make a foreign investor an attractive candidate when other bidders cannot claim such status. Of note, “excepted investor” status does not exempt a transaction from CFIUS jurisdiction if the investor will acquire “control” [2] over a U.S. business, as defined under applicable regulations, even if the target is not involved in sensitive activities (e.g., the production or development of “critical technologies”). Thus, while the benefits of “excepted investor” status are clear, CFIUS ultimately still has the right to review many transactions involving foreign acquirers from excepted foreign states.
Land Use and Zoning

Trusts and Estates

Estate Planning
Trusts
Power of Attorney
Authorize an Agent. You may designate an agent to make a request under the CCPA on your behalf. To do so, please provide the agent a written letter appointing the agent, acknowledged before a notary public. The agent must furnish a copy of the appointing letter to us when taking action under the CCPA on your behalf. You may also point an agent using a power of attorney pursuant to California Probate Code, Sections 4000 to 4465.

Bankruptcy
The appeal arose out of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Miami Metals II, Inc. (f/k/a Republic Metals Corporation), a precious metal refinery based in Miami, and a dispute between the Lenders and more than 50 of the debtors’ refining customers over the ownership of the debtors’ precious metal inventory. The customers, who had delivered scrap metal and other raw materials to the debtors for refining, contended that they continued to own the delivered metal throughout the refining process and therefore were entitled to return of the refined metals or payment in full. The Lenders, who held liens on substantially all of the debtors’ assets, argued that title had transferred to the debtors upon delivery to the refinery because the debtors were entitled to return “like kind” metal of equal value or cash to the customers. Ultimately, the debtors, the Lenders, and the customers agreed to a set of bespoke litigation procedures that allowed the parties to adjudicate the customer claims without the need to file 50 separate adversary proceedings, by grouping the customers into eight “buckets” based upon the characteristics of each customer’s agreement with the debtors.

View All Services

Provided by